Current Edge Daily Brief 15th September 2025

Quote of the Day

“The heart of a statesman should be in his head.” – NAPOLEON BONAPARTE

What the Others Say

“General Assembly resolutions are not binding, but they blaze the path to realizing the idea of a Palestinian state. Israel must stop the war in Gaza, obtain the release of the hostages, withdraw from the Strip and reopen the political path.” – HAARETZ, ISRAEL

Table of Contents

THE BIG PICTURE

  • IE Explained: Rationalise tariffs, independent of US pressure, and raise productivity (Ashok Gulati, Tanay Suntwal)
  • TH Text & Context: How serious is the global plastic pollution crisis? (Prakash Nelliyat)

The Big Picture

IE Explained: Rationalise tariffs, independent of US pressure, and raise productivity

Syllabus: Pre/Mains – International Relations, Economy

Why in News?

India is under pressure from the US for having high tariffs, especially on agricultural goods, being labelled “tariff king / tariff maharaja”—sparking debate over reform.

India’s Tariff Profile Compared Globally

  • Among G20, India has high simple average tariff (~16.2%) and very high trade-weighted average tariff (~12%) on all goods.
  • For agriculture: trade-weighted tariff ~64.3%, simple average ~36.7%, much above US (~4-5%) and EU/China.
  • For non-agriculture: India ~9.2% (trade-weighted), less extreme but still high relative to major trading partners.

Examples of Irrational / Uneven Tariffs

  • Edible oils (≈ one-third of agri-imports) get only ~10% duty.
  • Cotton, yellow peas: negligible tariffs.
  • Almonds <15%, whereas walnuts & chicken legs >100%.
  • Apples ~50%, blueberries ~30%, skimmed milk powder ~60%.
  • Food preparations (e.g. soft drink concentrates, custard powder, lactose syrup) ~150%.
  • Rice imposes ~70% duty despite India being the world’s largest exporter of rice.

Agri vs Industry: India’s agricultural imports face a much steeper tariff curve than industrial goods. Over 8 percent of farm products attract tariffs between 50–100 percent, compared to just 0.4 percent for non-agri items. Here’s how India’s trade barriers stack up.

Proposed Reforms & Recommendations

  • Rationalise tariff structure independent of US pressure:
    • Cap duties: raw materials at 0-10%; non-sensitive goods 10-20%; sensitive goods 20-35%; luxury items 35-50%, no duty to exceed 50%.
    • Use tariff rate quotas (TRQs) for sensitive agricultural goods to protect farmers while allowing some imports.
  • Raise domestic productivity:
    • Double agricultural R&D to at least 1% of agri-GDP.
    • Focus on precision agriculture.
    • Rationalise fertiliser subsidy via direct benefit transfer (DBT); free up fertiliser pricing.
  • Strengthen value chains: enhance efficiency in post-harvest, logistics, “farm to fork” movement.

Key Trade-Offs & Justifications

  • Agriculture protection is high due to large share of workforce (≈ 46%) in agriculture, small farm sizes (~1 hectare), food security concerns.
  • But excessive protection hurts competitiveness, trade negotiations, invites retaliation.
  • Imports can be part of growth strategy: comparative advantage, not just shield domestic producers

Test Your Knowledge 01

Q1. In the context of tariff policies, “tariff rate quotas (TRQs)” are best understood as:

(a) A system where tariffs are imposed only on luxury goods, not on essential goods.
(b) A mechanism that allows a specified quantity of a commodity to be imported at lower duty, with higher duty imposed on imports beyond that quantity.
(c) A WTO provision under which developed countries can unilaterally impose duties on agricultural imports.
(d) A subsidy scheme for exporters to neutralize the effect of import tariffs.

Hint :TRQs combine both quota and tariff features—lower duty up to a limit, higher duty beyond it.

TH Text & Context: How serious is the global plastic pollution crisis?

Syllabus: Pre/Mains – Environment

Why in News?

World Environment Day 2025 focused on “Ending Plastic Pollution”, highlighting urgent need for global action.

Scale of the Crisis

  • Rising production & waste: Plastics doubled 2000–2019; 460 MT produced, 353 MT waste.
  • Short lifespan: 2/3rd used <5 yrs; 40% packaging, 12% consumer goods, 11% textiles.
  • Poor waste handling: 9% recycled, 19% incinerated, 50% landfilled, 22% unmanaged.
  • Future risk: Waste may triple to 1.2 billion tonnes by 2060.
  • Marine impact: 11 MT enter oceans yearly; 200 MT already present; plastics may exceed fish by mid-century.

Why It Matters?

  • Non-biodegradable: Breaks into micro- & nano-plastics, contaminating soil, water, air.
  • Health hazards: Enters food chain, drinking water, human bloodstream.
  • Climate link: Plastics = 3.4% of global GHG emissions; may reach 19% of carbon budget by 2040.
  • Ecosystem loss: Threat to biodiversity, fisheries, tourism, agriculture.
  • Socio-economic cost: Impacts food security, livelihoods, public health expenditure.

Solutions Proposed

  • Global treaty: UN resolution for legally binding pact to end plastic pollution.
  • Production limits: Reduce virgin plastic, phase out single-use, promote alternatives.
  • Waste management: Recycling innovations, profitable secondary plastic markets.
  • Economic tools: Landfill/incineration taxes, deposit-refund, pay-as-you-throw, Extended Producer Responsibility.
  • Design shift: Eco-friendly packaging, biodegradable materials, circular economy.
  • Individual role: Reduce consumption, prefer reusables, support recycling.
  • Awareness & media: Behaviour change, campaigns, nudging sustainable lifestyle.

Test Your Knowledge 02

Q2. With reference to global plastic pollution, consider the following:

  1. Plastics production has more than doubled between 2000 and 2019.
  2. Nearly half of global plastic waste generated is from clothing and textiles.
  3. Less than 10% of plastic waste is recycled worldwide.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

(a) 1 only
(b) 2 and 3 only
(c) 1 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Hint: Production has surged since 2000 (true); packaging, not textiles, dominates waste (false); recycling rate is below 10% (true).