Ethics Workshop 2026 - Learn More
1st December 2025 | NEW BATCH: GS FOUNDATION - Jaipur - Sikar - Live-ONLINE - Admissions Open
Kalam Golden Pages (KGP) Booklets
Pratibimb Mentorship Program
Download Monthly Current Affairs Magazine (August 2025)

Current Edge Daily Brief 17th September 2025

Click here for Daily UPSC Current Affairs

Quote of the Day

“Information is a negotiator’s greatest weapon.” – VICTOR KIAM

What the Others Say

“Instead of raising the walls of the ghetto, Israel must do the opposite. It must sign a hostage deal, stop the war, say yes to regional partnership, listen to the world and accept its willingness to be a guarantor for the ‘day after’ in Gaza.” – HAARETZ, ISRAEL

Table of Contents

THE BIG PICTURE

  • IE Explained: Issues in SC hearings on timeline for the President and Governors to assent to Bills (Apurva Vishwanath)

ETHICS WEEKLY

  • Charlie Kirk shot dead in US
  • Gaza Crisis

NEWS IN SHORT

  • Manki-Munda Self-Governance
  • Govt employees can opt for UPS till September 30

The Big Picture

IE Explained: Issues in SC hearings on timeline for the President and Governors to assent to Bills

Syllabus: Pre/Mains – Polity

Why in News?

SC reserved opinion on Presidential reference (Art. 143) regarding whether timelines can be fixed for President/Governors to assent to Bills.

Nature of Reference

  •  Article 143: President may seek SC opinion on questions of law/public importance.
  • SC not bound to answer; past refusals exist.
  • States’ view: Reference = disguised appeal/review of April ruling; undermines stare decisis.
  • Centre’s view: Advisory jurisdiction distinct; can clarify constitutional doubts despite past rulings.

Governor’s Powers

  • States: Bound by aid & advice ( 163); primacy of elected govt; Governors ≠ Viceroys.
  • Centre: Not mere “postman”; discretionary powers exist; Constituent Assembly rejected removal of discretion.
  • Example: 2004 Punjab River Water Termination Act → struck down in 2016.

Governor’s Veto / Withholding Assent

  • SC April ruling: No “pocket veto”; must act.
  • Centre: Withholding = Bill lapses; echoes colonial GOI Act, 1935 “absolute veto.”
  • States: Colonial veto powers intentionally omitted; Governors must act.
  • Data: 1970–present → ~17,000 Bills, only ~20 withheld; 90% assented within 1 month.

Timelines for Assent

  • Centre: SC cannot fix timelines; Constituent Assembly deleted 6-week limit; “as soon as possible” = flexible; judicial timelines = “judicial amendment.”
  • Political resolution preferable over judicial diktat.
  • States: “As soon as possible” implies immediacy; timelines in April ruling = trigger for judicial review, not automatic assent.

States & Fundamental Rights

  • Centre: 32 remedies for individuals, not states; Governors ≠ Union agents.
  • States: Right to move SC essential; Governors = Union-State link; denial weakens federal balance.
  • Even NDA ally Andhra Pradesh supported states’ writ rights.
Centre’s/State’s Arguments in Governor’s or President’s Veto Powers – Summary
IssueState’s ArgumentCentre’s Argument
Nature of Reference (Art. 143)Reference = disguised appeal/review of April ruling; violates stare decisisAdvisory jurisdiction distinct; SC can clarify constitutional doubts even after rulings
Governor’s Powers (Art. 163)Bound by aid & advice; primacy of elected govt; Governors ≠ ViceroysNot mere “postman”; discretionary powers exist; Assembly rejected removal of discretion
Veto / Withholding AssentGovernors cannot sit indefinitely; colonial veto powers omittedWithholding = Bill lapses; echoes colonial GOI Act 1935 absolute veto
Timelines for Assent (Art. 200)Bound by aid & advice; primacy of elected govt; Governors ≠ ViceroysNot mere “postman”; discretionary powers exist; Assembly rejected removal of discretion
States & Fundamental Rights (Art. 32)States must have right to move SC; Governors = Union-State linkArt. 32 remedies only for individuals; Governors not Union agents

Test Your Knowledge 01

Q1. Consider the following pairs of cases and their relevance to Governor’s powers:

  1. Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974) – Limited scope of Governor’s discretionary powers.
  2. K. Pavitra case (2019) – Reaffirmed Governor’s wide discretion in reserving Bills.
  3. State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu (2025) – Held that “pocket veto” by Governor is unconstitutional.

Which of the above pairs is/are correctly matched?

(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 1 and 3 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Hint: Pavitra (2019) had confusion; later called per incuriam.

Q2. Consider the following statements regarding Article 143 (Presidential Reference):

  1. The Supreme Court is constitutionally bound to provide its opinion when the President refers a question of law or fact.
  2. In the past, the Supreme Court has declined to answer Presidential References.
  3. The opinion given by the Supreme Court under Article 143 is binding on the President.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 2 only
(b) 1 and 3 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Hint: Opinion is advisory, not binding; SC may refuse

Ethics Weekly

News Ethical Issues

Charlie Kirk shot dead in US

News: Conservative activist Charlie Kirk was fatally shot on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University, sparking widespread controversy over political violence, free speech suppression, and organized retaliation campaigns against his critics.
  • Political Assassination Ethics: Using violence to silence political opponents undermines democratic discourse and rule of law
  • Free Speech Suppression: Mass employment terminations (33+ people) for expressing political opinions violates First Amendment principles
  • State-Sanctioned Retaliation: Pentagon and State Department tracking critics to punish speech through employment and immigration threats
  • Coordinated Harassment Campaigns: Systematic doxxing and organized vigilante justice campaigns targeting Kirk’s critics with death threats
  • Justice System Politicization: Death penalty pursuit influenced by political pressure rather than legal merit before trial completion

Gaza Crisis

News: Israel launched a major ground offensive in Gaza City on September 15, 2025, after ordering 350,000 residents to evacuate, with total war casualties reaching 66,700 people (83% civilians) and a UN commission concluding Israel committed genocide.
  • Genocide Allegations: UN commission officially concluded Israel committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza with systematic intent to destroy the population
  • Disproportionate Civilian Casualties: Israeli military data shows 83% of Gaza war deaths are civilians, creating one of highest civilian casualty rates in modern warfare
  • Starvation as Warfare: 422 Palestinians died from malnutrition including 130 children, indicating deliberate use of starvation as weapon of war
  • Targeting Protected Persons: Systematic killing of 217 journalists, 224 humanitarian workers, and attacks on hospitals violates international humanitarian law
  • Forced Mass Displacement: Evacuation orders affecting 350,000 people in Gaza City constitute forced displacement and ethnic cleansing under international law

News in Short

Manki-Munda Self-Governance

Why in News?

Sept 9, 2025: Ho adivasis in West Singhbhum, Jharkhand, protested against DC’s alleged interference in Manki-Munda self-governance.

Traditional System

  • Munda: hereditary village head; settles socio-political disputes.
  • Manki: head of 8–15 villages (pir); hears unresolved cases.
  • Decentralised, internal; no tax/revenue role originally.
  • Hereditary succession; posts also include assistants.

Colonial Transformation

  • East India Company: taxation post-Plassey (1757), Buxar (1764), Permanent Settlement (1793).
  • Ho, Kol revolts (1821–22, 1831–32) against land seizure.
  • Compromise: British recognised system under Wilkinson’s Rules (1833, 31 rules).
  • Kolhan Government Estate (1837) created; Mundas/Mankis became intermediaries.
  • Impact: influx of outsiders (dikkus) → 1,579 (1867) → 15,755 (1897); private property concept; raiyats, pattas introduced.

Post-Independence Continuity

  • Kolhan Government Estate dissolved 1947, but Wilkinson’s Rules continue.
  • Courts upheld customs (till 2000); Mora Ho vs State of Bihar: rules = customs, not law, but allowed continuation.
  • Jharkhand govt 2021: Nyaya Panch recognised for revenue, law & order, land disputes.

Present Conflict

  • Complaints: Mundas blocking OBC/SC livelihoods, absenteeism, delay in documents.
  • DC’s 9-point directive: transparency, based on Hukuknama 1837; misinterpreted as removal.
  • Administration view: no interference, only clarification.
  • Vacant posts: 1,850 sanctioned; ~200 vacant; 50 filled via Gram Sabhas.

Larger Issues

  • Tribal autonomy vs state oversight: fear of erosion of self-rule.
  • Hereditary leadership: uneducated leaders struggle in modern bureaucracy.
  • Youth voices: demand reforms, merit-based selection.
  • Non-tribal raiyats: sometimes bypass system → resentment.
  • DC’s role today: limited but crucial in succession, land disputes, interpretation.

Significance

  • Cultural survival: symbol of Ho identity, resistance to outsiders.
  • Legal anomaly: pre-colonial/colonial rules still valid; partial exemptions from civil laws.
  • Federal/tribal governance debate: autonomy, integration, reform.

Govt employees can opt for UPS till September 30

Why in News?

Govt employees have time till Sept 30, 2025 to opt for Unified Pension Scheme (UPS); uptake remains very low.

What is UPS?

  • Announced: Cabinet, Aug 2024; effective Apr 1, 2025.
  • Coverage: Central govt employees under NPS (post-Jan 1, 2004 entrants).
  • Nature: Optional (not mandatory like NPS).
  • Assured pension: 50% of average basic pay (last 12 months) with 25 yrs service.
  • Family pension: 60% of pension to spouse on death.
  • Minimum guarantee: ₹10,000/month after 10 yrs service.
  • Corpus: Govt contribution 8.5% of basic + DA.
  • Lump sum: 1/10th of last basic + DA for each completed 6 months.
  • Ineligible: Dismissed employees.

UPS vs NPS vs OPS

  • OPS: No contribution; 50% of last drawn pay + DA; fully govt funded.
  • NPS: Employee 10% + Govt 14%; market-linked, no assured payout, corpus-based.
  • UPS: Employee 10% + Govt 10% + Govt 8.5% corpus; assured payout (50% avg basic of last yr).
  • Flexibility: UPS subscribers can revert to NPS once (before superannuation/VRS).

Why Slow Uptake?

  • Low trust: Employees still demand OPS restoration.
  • Perception: UPS ≠ OPS (lower benefits, contribution burden).
  • Awareness gap: Ongoing govt outreach (Sep 9 meeting with ministries).
  • Short window: Initial deadline June 30, extended to Sept 30.
  • Data: Only 40,000 opted out of 23.94 lakh NPS employees (as of Sep 15)
Download PDF - Current Edge Daily Brief 17th September 2025