Current Edge Daily Brief 18th October 2025

Quote of the Day

“The greatest danger of AI is that people conclude too early that they understand it.” – ELIEZER YUDKOWSKY

What the Others Say

“The US has a long and inglorious history of intervention in Latin America. But Mr Trump will be wary of angering Maga supporters with military action and of looking like a paper tiger if Mr Maduro endures again.” – THE GUARDIAN

Table of Contents

THE BIG PICTURE

  • IE Explained: Mutaqqi visits UP seminary: What is Darul Uloom Deoband, why it is significant (Asad Rehman)
  • TH Ground Zero: Green rhetoric versus the practical reality (R. Krishna Kumar)

The Big Picture

IE Explained: Mutaqqi visits UP seminary: What is Darul Uloom Deoband, why it is significant

Syllabus: Pre/Mains – History, Art & Culture

Why in News?

→ Afghanistan FM Amir Khan Muttaqi’s visit to Darul Uloom Deoband (UP) highlights Indo-Afghan historical ties & Deoband’s transnational religious influence.

Darul Uloom Deoband: Origin & Evolution

  • Est. → 31 May 1866, Deoband (Saharanpur, UP) post-1857 revolt
  • Purpose → Islamic alternative to British-run universities
  • Sister institution → Nadwatul Ulema (Lucknow, 1883)
  • Global reach → Students from Afghanistan, Iran, Bukhara, SE Asia, Africa
  • Status → 2nd only to Al-Azhar (Cairo) in Islamic scholarship prestige
  • Role in freedom struggle → Fostered anti-colonial consciousness among Muslims

Deoband Movement: Ideology & Influence

  • School of thought → Sunni Islam → Hanafi jurisprudence
  • Doctrine → Quran + Hadith + rational interpretation (Abu Hanifa)
  • Goal → Revivalist reform, purity in practice, avoidance of Westernization
  • Education model → Traditional Islamic sciences (Shariah, Sunnah, Tariqah)
  • Global impact → Network of ~30,000 Deobandi madrasas worldwide

Link with Afghanistan

  • Early ties → Afghan students among 1st foreign batches (19th century)
  • Deobandi madrasas in Afghanistan → Founded by Deoband-trained scholars
  • Post-Partition offshoot → Darul Uloom Haqqania (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan) → “University of Jihad” → many Taliban leaders alumni
  • Post-1979 → Shift of Afghan students to Pakistani Deobandi madrasas → ↑ militancy influence
  • Current context → Afghan Sunni religious ethos still largely Deobandi

Muttaqi’s Visit: Symbolism & Message

  • Event → Huge local turnout → public address cancelled (crowd control)
  • Remarks → Gratitude for hospitality; hopes for ↑ Indo-Afghan engagement
  • Gesture → Darul Uloom conferred honorary title ‘Qasmi’ to Muttaqi (ex-Haqqania alumnus)
  • Diplomatic signal → India’s cautious engagement with Taliban regime
  • Seminary stance → Maintains apolitical, non-alignment with Taliban or Pakistan policies

Significance

  • Soft power → India’s religious institutions shaping Islamic thought in Asia
  • Historical continuity → Deoband–Afghanistan intellectual linkage since 19th century
  • Foreign policy angle → Platform for low-key outreach amid non-recognition of Taliban govt
  • Cultural diplomacy → Shared religious heritage fostering people-to-people connect.

Test Your Knowledge 01

Q. With reference to the Deoband Movement, consider the following statements:

  1. It originated as a theological reform movement within Sunni Islam following the Hanafi school.
  2. It sought to integrate modern Western education with Islamic learning to strengthen Muslim society.
  3. Its founders opposed British colonial rule and emphasized preservation of Islamic culture through religious education.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only
(b) 1 and 3 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Hint: The Deoband Movement rejected Westernization (so 2 is wrong) and aimed at purifying Islam & resisting British influence.

Q. In terms of religious jurisprudence, the Deobandi school primarily differs from the Salafi school in that:

(a) It emphasizes reason (ra’y) and precedent (qiyas) under Hanafi tradition rather than strict literalism
(b) It rejects Sufism entirely
(c) It considers only the Quran as the sole source of law
(d) It follows Shia interpretations of jurisprudencer

Hint: Hanafi-Deobandi uses analogical reasoning & tradition; Salafis reject rationalist interpretation.

TH Ground Zero: Green rhetoric versus the practical reality

Syllabus: Pre/Mains – Environment

Why in News?

6 tiger deaths & ↑ human–wildlife conflict in Karnataka expose policy contradiction between “green” rhetoric & infra-driven reality.

Policy–Practice Contradiction

  • Lofty sustainability talk → reality: infra > environment
  • Forest Dept. itself approves ecologically harmful projects
  • Activists note pattern → prioritising “development” at cost of ecology

Major Environment–Infra Flashpoints

a) Sharavathi Pumped Storage Project

  • 2,000 MW hydro by KPCL → 42.51 ha forest + 60.53 ha non-forest from Sharavathi Valley Lion-Tailed Macaque Sanctuary
  • Threat → endemic species (≈700 lion-tailed macaques), evergreen forests
  • NBWL ‘in-principle’ ok → weak opposition, cosmetic mitigation
  • Citizens’ movement “Parisarakkaagi Naavu” opposing; demand eco-integrity in renewables

b) Mini-Hydel Projects – Cauvery WLS

  • 3 proposals (Ranganathaswamy, Bharachukki, Balaji Cauvery) → 4.863 ha + others diverted
  • Small individually, but cumulative ecological loss → habitat fragmentation, wildlife barrier
  • Linked to ↑ conflict & recent 6 tiger deaths (5 in June + 1 in Oct 2025)

c) Goa–Tamnar 400 kV Line

  • 94 km line (72 km forest stretch, incl. 6.6 km through Anshi–Dandeli TR)
  • 177 ha forest diverted, 62,000 trees felled
  • Govt U-turn → revived despite prior caution

d) Hubballi–Ankola Railway

  • Risks fragmenting pristine Western Ghats forest → long-term biodiversity loss

Conflict & Conservation Fallout

  • Human deaths (2023–24): 48 by elephants; (2019–25): 160 total; 12 by tigers (2021–24)
  • 2024–25: 35,580 conflict cases (₹21.61 cr compensation) → elephants (22,483) > boar (6,226) > leopards (3,738) > tigers (554)
  • Root causes → habitat loss + encroachment + infra fragmentation
  • Local resentment ↑ → ↓ community support for conservation

Encroachment & Habitat Erosion

  • Pending encroachment cases (2025): 44,812 (↑ 559 new)
  • Only 243 cleared → slow action
  • Bengaluru Circle → 4,849 cases; highest conflict numbers (8,149 crop loss + 1,123 cattle kill)

Forest Cover & Land Diversion

  • Forest cover (2025): 40,678 sq km = 21.21% (↓ from 22.64% in 2018–19)
  • Till Mar 2024 → 807 projects cleared = 32,422 ha forest diverted
     ↳ 72 irrigation, 148 mining, 83 roads, 19 rail, 129 power lines
  • 2024–25 → 143 more projects = 277 ha diverted

Broader Implications

  • “Renewable” ≠ “sustainable” if biodiversity compromised
  • Fragmentation → ↑ conflict, ↓ ecological stability
  • Rhetoric ↑ vs Green cover ↓ → credibility gap
  • Without local inclusion + strict eco-screening → conservation goals fail

Conclusion : Karnataka’s “green” claims mask systemic policy failure — relentless infrastructure expansion, forest diversion & weak enforcement are pushing wildlife, forests, and people into unsustainable conflict.

Test Your Knowledge 02

Q. In India, the term “Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ)” is legally defined under which of the following instruments?

(a) Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
(b) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
(c) Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972
(d) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010

Hint: Declared under EPA 1986 using MoEFCC notifications → regulate activities around protected areas.