“Hypocrisy, double standards and ‘buts nots’ are the price of universalist pretensions.” – SAMUEL P HUNTINGTON
What the Others Say
“The White House wanted India to bow. Instead, Narendra Modi flew to China, shook Xi Jinping’s hand and left Washington sidelined.” – THE GUARDIAN
Table of Contents
THE BIG PICTURE
IE Explained: Why Supreme Court wants to revisit Right to Education exemption for minority schools (Vidheesha Kuntamalla)
IE Explained: What is the ‘axis of upheaval’, and what does it mean for the US and India? (Sonal Gupta)
TH Text & Context: Decoding the SC order on regulatory assets (Rishu Garg)
NEWS IN SHORT
APEDA launches BHARATI initiative to boost agri-food exports
The Big Picture
IE Explained: Why Supreme Court wants to revisit Right to Education exemption for minority schools
Syllabus: Pre/Mains – Society & Social Justice
Why in News?
Supreme Court questions its 2014 judgment that exempted minority schools from Right to Education Act, referring matter to larger bench for reconsideration.
Background: Right to Education Act 2009
Core mandate: Free elementary education for children aged 6-14 under Article 21A
Key requirements: 25% quota for disadvantaged students in private schools, qualified teachers, proper infrastructure, no corporal punishment
Original exemption: Only religious instruction institutions like madrasas excluded, not minority-run schools
Child-centric approach: Focused on individual child’s right rather than institutional autonomy
The 2014 Pramati Judgment Problem
Blanket exemption granted: All minority schools (aided/unaided) freed from RTE compliance including 25% quota
Constitutional conflict: Court prioritized Article 30(1) minority rights over Article 21A education rights
Immediate misuse: Many private schools sought minority status to escape RTE obligations
Elite shield: So-called minority institutions continued as exclusive schools without admitting poor children from own community
Current Supreme Court Concerns (September 2025)
Undermined universal education: 2014 ruling fragmented common schooling vision and weakened inclusivity
Regulatory loophole: Created surge in institutions seeking minority status to bypass RTE requirements
Quality compromise: Minority school children denied benefits like trained teachers, infrastructure, mid-day meals
Social division: Reinforced divides instead of creating integrated classrooms across communities
Court’s New Position
Case-by-case approach: 25% quota impact on minority character should be judged individually, not blanket exemption
Same community admission: Suggested fulfilling quota through disadvantaged children from same minority group
Teacher standards apply: All schools including minority must follow Teacher Eligibility Test for hiring
Balance needed: Article 21A and Article 30(1) can coexist without destroying minority identity
Next Steps
Larger bench review: Matter referred to Chief Justice for 7-judge constitution bench
Four key questions framed: Whether 2014 exemption needs reconsideration and how to balance minority rights with universal education
Potential outcome: If overturned, minority schools may need to comply with RTE provisions including 25% quota.
IE Explained: What is the ‘axis of upheaval’, and what does it mean for the US and India?
Syllabus: Pre/Mains – International Relations
Why in News?
Xi Jinping championed a “multipolar world” at the recent Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit attended by Modi and Putin, highlighting the growing challenge to US global dominance by the “axis of upheaval” countries.
What is the ‘Axis of Upheaval’?
Origins & Definition
Term coined by Andrea Kendall-Taylor and Richard Fontaine in April 2024 Foreign Affairs article
Describes loose alignment of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea (CRINK)
Not formal alliance but “collection of dissatisfied states” seeking to overturn US-dominated international system
Shared purpose of creating alternative to current Western-led global order
Key Characteristics
Deepening economic, military, political and technological cooperation
Anti-Western sentiments binding factor rather than formal treaties
Accelerated cooperation after Russia’s 2022 Ukraine invasion
Also called “quartet of chaos” or “axis of autocracies”
CRINK Countries & Internal Dynamics
China-Russia Relations
“No-limits” partnership since 2022
Massive pipeline deal for Russian gas to China as Europe phases out Russian energy
Russia increasingly isolated, pushing closer to China since 2014 Crimea annexation
China maintains distance from Ukraine war to avoid complete Western abandonment
Iran’s Role
90% of Iranian oil imports go to China amid Western sanctions
Supplies drones to Russia for Ukraine war
20-year defense pact with Russia signed January 2025
Strategic partnership with China since 2021
North Korea’s Position
Deployed 11,000+ soldiers to support Russia in Ukraine
Mutual defense pact with Iran signed
Move strains China-North Korea ties as Beijing loses regional influence
Kim Jong Un’s first international trip since 2023 to China military parade
Implications for the United States
Strategic Challenges
Undermines effectiveness of Western sanctions and export controls
Erodes US military advantages in key regions like Middle East
Creates alternative economic forum diluting US foreign policy tools
Third major challenge to US power after Axis Powers (1937-41) and Cold War (1948-62)
Global Impact
Emboldens other anti-Western states and actors
Contributes to more unstable global environment
Pushes transformation toward two opposing international orders
Creates opportunities for regional conflicts and coups in Africa
India’s Complex Position
Current Tensions with US
Trump imposed 50% tariffs on India, higher than China
25% penalty on Russian oil purchases plus 25% reciprocal levy
Trade talks stalled since reciprocal tariffs took effect
Trump criticism of India’s high tariffs and trade barriers
Engagement with Axis Countries
Modi’s first China visit in 7 years at SCO summit
Bilateral meetings with both Xi and Putin
Member of SCO and BRICS alongside China, Russia, Iran
India-China called each other “partners, not rivals” at summit
Strategic Balancing
Distances itself from anti-Western views of axis countries
Maintains engagement with US despite tariff disputes
Values strategic autonomy over alignment with single bloc
Democrats criticize Trump for “singling out” India and “sabotaging” ties
Challenge is maintaining sovereignty while preserving US relationship
TH Text & Context: Decoding the SC order on regulatory assets
Syllabus: Pre/Mains – Economy
Why in News?
Supreme Court directed State Electricity Regulatory Commissions and DISCOMs to clear existing regulatory assets within four years and new assets within three years, with 3% ARR cap.
Understanding Regulatory Assets
Definition and Mechanism
Unrecoverable revenue gap between Average Cost of Supply (ACS) and Annual Revenue Requirement (ARR)
Created when DISCOM’s cost per unit exceeds revenue collected from tariffs and subsidies
Deferred cost recovery mechanism to avoid sudden tariff shocks to consumers
Recorded as future receivables with carrying interest costs